← All work
Case study 02 · Rentman · 2022–2023

Product Vision for Crew Scheduling

A two-year product vision that transformed Crew Scheduling from a mid-market planning tool into a scalable enterprise operations backbone — and generated 80% revenue growth.

Role
Senior Product Owner
Timeline
2022–2023
Scope
Vision · Strategy · Evangelization
Team
1 PO · eng · design · GTM
80%
Revenue increase driven by vision
Faster scheduling with click-to-plan
100+
Customer interviews informing the vision
2yr
Roadmap horizon established
01

Strategic context

Rentman identified two strategic priorities at once: expand deeper into the U.S. market and move upmarket into Enterprise accounts. Both required a fundamentally different product, not incremental improvement.

Crew Scheduling was strong but optimised for mid-market event companies. Enterprise and U.S. customers needed higher configurability, stronger process control, clearer workflow ownership, faster planning, and better communication and confirmation loops.

This was not about shipping isolated features. It was about defining where the product needed to go strategically — and then making sure the whole organization believed it.

So I led the creation and evangelisation of a two-year product vision. The vision wasn't a roadmap. It was a narrative — one that could align engineering, sales, customer success and leadership around a shared direction.

02

Problem identification

Before defining a future state we went deep into the current one, across four research tracks.

Track 01 · Dogfooding

We scheduled real scenarios internally — multi-day projects, crew substitutions, last-minute time changes, cross-project conflicts — and felt the friction ourselves: too many manual steps, limited overview, draft indistinguishable from definitive.

Track 02 · Catfooding

We tested competitors across the U.S. and EU. Some were stronger on workflow structure, others on utilisation visibility. Few handled enterprise customisation cleanly, and most lacked integration between planning and communication.

Track 03 · Research

Customer interviews, sales feedback, CS escalations, Productboard requests, usage analytics and enterprise deal losses. U.S. customers needed structured confirmation workflows; enterprise clients wanted process control and cross-department status visibility.

Track 04 · JTBD

We reframed from “what features are missing?” to “what jobs are users trying to accomplish?” That analysis shaped the entire direction of the vision.

Core jobs identified
  • When planning a project, I want to assign the right crew member quickly, so my project stays on schedule.
  • When managing multiple projects, I want a clear overview, so I can avoid staffing conflicts.
  • When sending confirmations, I want clarity, so I don't chase people manually.
  • I want to feel in control of complex planning — and look professional towards clients and crew.
  • I need visibility into planning status across departments and standardized workflows across teams.
03

What I did

A vision only works if it is adopted internally. I structured evangelisation across four audiences, each needing a different framing.

  1. 01Engineering — vision walkthroughs, mockup demos, and roadmap items linked to strategic objectives, making the why visible behind every ticket.
  2. 02Stakeholders — connected improvements to U.S. expansion goals and enterprise readiness, framed as competitive differentiation rather than UX polish.
  3. 03Sales and marketing — enabled Sales with the narrative for enterprise conversations, and Marketing with forward-looking messaging and a clear product story.
  4. 04Leadership — aligned the vision with U.S. revenue growth, enterprise deal size and long-term differentiation. Business outcomes, not feature lists.
  5. 05Validation — short sessions with selected enterprise customers and U.S.-focused feedback calls before full rollout, confirming click-to-plan reduced friction and confirmation workflows cut operational follow-up.
The hardest part

Resisting the pull to publish a feature list. A roadmap gets nodded at; a narrative gets repeated back to you by someone in Sales six months later. That repetition is the actual deliverable.

04

The solution

Instead of jumping to features, we built a multi-layered vision artefact — narrative, mockups and strategic framing.

SELECT → MATCH → CONFIRM
01

The narrative: “Uber for crew planning”

Select a function, instantly see best-fit crew, click to plan, auto-validate availability, send confirmation, track status live. Planning becomes proactive instead of reactive.

MESSAGE ALIGNED PRE-BUILD
02

Future press release

A press-style narrative positioning speed, control, enterprise visibility and reduced operational chaos — aligning messaging before a line of code was written.

PRIMARYSECONDARYHISTORICAL
MARKET · PRODUCT · POSITION
03

Whitepaper vision

Documented the market shift toward distributed event operations, U.S. requirements and enterprise standardisation. The product stopped being a scheduling tool and became an operations backbone.

3× FASTER SCHEDULING
04

Click-to-plan workflows

The headline mechanism — 3× faster scheduling for project managers, with availability auto-validated at the point of assignment.

CONFLICTS SURFACE EARLY
05

360° overview dashboards

Availability hover previews, colour-coded scheduling states and collapsible project views, so conflicts surface before they become escalations.

DRAFT → CONFIRM → TRACKED
06

Confirmation request flows

Team-based crew lists with a clear draft versus definitive distinction — the change that most increased planner confidence.

05

Outcome & impact

80%
revenue increase from vision-driven roadmap
faster scheduling with click-to-plan
40%
revenue boost from licensing changes

Crew Scheduling evolved from a functional planning tool into a scalable enterprise crew operations platform. Enterprise conversations got stronger and the product narrative matured from feature-led to vision-led. The lesson: a clear vision, backed by deep research and systematically evangelised, is the highest-leverage tool a PM has — every incremental improvement tied back to a coherent one-to-two-year direction, giving engineers clarity, sales confidence and leadership belief.

06

What I'd do differently

Put the JTBD analysis in front of leadership earlier. The narrative landed, but the jobs are what made it defensible under challenge — and they arrived a month late.

Revisit the vision artefact quarterly. It was treated as finished once adopted, and by the second year parts of it described a market that had already moved.